Velo Media

Eurobike Lost the Plot. Now It’s Doing Something About It.

Written by :

Posted on :

Every cycling industry group chat I’m in is doing the same thing right now: piling on Eurobike. It’s the familiar reflex of a hundred people who stayed quiet for a decade suddenly discovering they always knew better. I want to push back on that — not because the criticism is wrong, but because the conclusion most people are drawing from it is.

 

Last week the organizers announced that Eurobike 2027 will move back to the first week of September — September 1 to 3 — and shift into Halls 3, 4 and 5 on the eastern side of Messe Frankfurt, built around the Agora outdoor area. They also committed to a sharper B2B orientation: workshops, training, start-ups, innovation and media, rather than the half-trade, half-festival animal the show had become. This wasn’t a hunch. It came out of roughly 50 industry interviews and a customer survey, and the organizers say the majority of the industry clearly favored September.

 

I think this is the right call. I also think the reaction to it tells us something uncomfortable about our own industry.

 

First, let’s be honest about what went wrong

 

I’m not here to pretend Eurobike has been well run. It hasn’t, and the problems were not subtle.

 

The date was wrong. The show drifted from its traditional late-summer slot, and then earlier still — into June — after the move to Frankfurt. June is the middle of the selling season. Asking dealers, brand managers and media to drop everything and travel mid-season was asking them to do the one thing the calendar makes hardest. Everyone knew it. It took years to act on it.

 

The pricing didn’t match the value. Participation costs ran higher than what many brands paid in the Friedrichshafen era, and that’s a hard pill when budgets are already under pressure and the bike market is still digesting its post-COVID hangover. When the perceived return on a stand is falling and the invoice is rising, brands don’t argue — they just don’t rebook.

 

Frankfurt is expensive. Hotels, logistics, build costs — the whole Frankfurt envelope is costly in a way Friedrichshafen never was. For a small or mid-size brand, the difference between “we’ll be there” and “we’ll skip a year” is often just the hotel bill.

 

And the positioning was muddled. Was this a trade fair for the enthusiast cycling industry, or a platform for ecomobility, micromobility and the broader future-of-transport story? Eurobike tried to be both. The result was a show where a premium road brand and a cargo-fleet mobility startup were nominally at the same event but speaking to nobody in particular. When a show can’t tell you who it’s for, exhibitors can’t tell whether it’s for them.

 

Those four problems compounded. Specialized, Scott and SRAM had already stepped back. Bosch eBike Systems confirmed it would skip 2026. Shimano announced a withdrawal in January, then returned in April with an outdoor demo. Germany’s two most influential trade bodies, ZIV and Zukunft Fahrrad, pulled their support in October and floated the idea of a rival event. Visitor and exhibitor numbers have been sliding for years — 2025 drew about 31,700 trade visitors against more than 35,000 the year before, a long way from the 43,700 the show pulled in its 2013 Friedrichshafen peak.

 

So no, this is not a defense of the status quo. The status quo is what got us here.

 

But here is the part the group chats are skipping

 

A struggling institution that does nothing deserves the pile-on. A struggling institution that runs 50 stakeholder interviews, fields a customer survey, builds an advisory board of senior people from industry, retail and the associations, and then actually changes its date, its hall layout and its entire positioning in response — that is not the same story.

 

That second story is the one we’re living in, and it deserves a different reaction.

 

The advisory board isn’t window dressing. The September move is the single most-requested change the industry has asked for, for years, and they did it. The B2B refocus directly addresses the “who is this for” problem. The shortened 2026 format and reduced exhibitor costs go straight at the pricing complaint. You can argue it’s late. You cannot argue it’s not listening.

 

What worries me is the reflex I’m watching play out in industry chats right now — the piling on. It’s easy, it costs nothing, and it feels like insight. But it’s worth asking what the people doing it actually want. If the answer is “a healthy, international, well-run trade platform for our industry,” then kicking that platform while it’s mid-pivot is a strange way to get there. Trade fairs are not infinitely resilient. They can die. And the fragmentation that replaces a dead one — a dozen regional shows, a scatter of brand-owned events — costs the small and mid-size brands the most, because they’re the ones who can’t afford to chase ten calendars instead of one.

 

2026 will be hard. Say it out loud.

 

I’m not going to sugarcoat the bridge year. 2026 is going to be tough, and the exhibitor list shows it. As I write this, the Eurobike site lists only 18 exhibitors for Italy — for one of the most important manufacturing countries in this entire industry. That number will climb before June, but it is not a number that lies about the moment we’re in.

 

Anyone expecting the 2026 show to feel like 2015 is going to be disappointed, and the organizers themselves have framed it honestly: 2026 is a signpost, not the destination. The reset lands in 2027. Judging the recovery by the bridge year would be like judging a renovation by the week the kitchen is torn out.

 

Why I’ll be there anyway

 

I’m participating in Eurobike personally this year, and I’m doing it with a clear head about the above. I’m not going because I think the show is fixed. I’m going because I think the people running it have finally started asking the right questions and acting on the answers — and because an industry gets the institutions it shows up for.

 

The cycling business does not need another graveyard of good intentions. It needs at least one serious, international, B2B-focused gathering point, and right now Eurobike is the one making a credible, structural attempt to become that again. The honest move isn’t to cheer or to jeer. It’s to hold them to the plan, show up, and give the 2027 reset a real chance to land.

 

The group chats will keep making their noise. I’d rather be in Frankfurt.

Like this content? Sign up for the ‘Business of Cycling’ newsletter and receive updates right in your inbox.