November 3, 2025
When ZIV and Zukunft Fahrrad announced their withdrawal from Eurobike 2026, it wasn’t just two German associations walking away from a trade show. It was the culmination of a slow-motion identity crisis that transformed cycling’s flagship event into an unrecognizable sprawl—and the industry’s clearest signal yet that the future of trade shows looks radically different than their past.
The numbers tell a brutal story. While Eurobike commanded premium pricing that could consume a significant portion of a small brand’s annual marketing budget, a constellation of regional alternatives emerged offering targeted value at a fraction of the cost. The Italian Bike Festival, Roc d’Azur, Rouleur Live, Cycling World Düsseldorf, Sea Otter (both US and European editions), and Velofollies aren’t trying to be everything to everyone—and that’s precisely why they’re thriving. These shows understand their audience, serve specific communities, and deliver focused experiences without breaking exhibitor budgets or requiring attendees to block out half a week and navigate international travel logistics.
This regionalization represents more than cost optimization. It reflects how the cycling industry actually operates now. A brand targeting road cycling enthusiasts in Europe gets better ROI from Rouleur Live than competing for attention in Frankfurt’s endless halls. An Italian boutique manufacturer connects with their core market more effectively at the Italian Bike Festival. Sea Otter taps directly into North American cycling culture with festival energy that European mega-shows can’t replicate. These events succeed because they embraced specificity while Eurobike chased scale.
But Eurobike’s problems run deeper than competition. Somewhere along the way, the show made a fateful strategic pivot toward “mobility”—a catch-all term that diluted cycling into just another transportation modality alongside e-scooters, cargo solutions, and urban micro-mobility platforms. For commercial exhibitors selling to municipalities and fleet operators, this made sense. For the cycling enthusiasts, brands, and retailers who built Eurobike’s reputation, it felt like abandonment.
The enthusiast cycling segment—road, mountain, gravel, the passion-driven purchases that sustain specialty retailers—increasingly found itself marginalized in favor of practical urban transportation solutions. There’s nothing wrong with e-cargo bikes and last-mile delivery systems; they’re important parts of cycling’s future. But when a show built on the energy of cycling culture starts prioritizing commuter infrastructure over the products and innovations that drive enthusiast engagement, something essential gets lost. Claus Fleischer’s comment about needing “fundamental changes as a prerequisite and clear signal for a successful future” speaks directly to this identity drift.
The demographic shift among exhibitors compounded the problem. Eurobike’s aggressive courtship of Far East manufacturers fundamentally changed the show’s character. What was once a curated showcase of innovation became increasingly crowded with generic OEM suppliers targeting bulk orders rather than brand storytelling. Walk the halls in recent years and you’d find endless rows of nearly identical e-bike motors, battery packs, and frame factories—valuable for certain buyers, but a far cry from the product launches and brand experiences that defined Eurobike’s golden era.
The core tension becomes clear: Eurobike tried to be simultaneously a micro-mobility trade conference, an OEM sourcing marketplace, an enthusiast brand showcase, a retail education platform, and a cultural celebration. This “everything to everyone” strategy satisfies no one optimally. B2B buyers want efficiency, not spectacle. Enthusiast brands need energy and storytelling space, not competition with cargo bike fleet operators. Retailers seek education and relationships with decision-makers, not junior staff manning massive booths in an overwhelming environment.
The ZIV and Zukunft Fahrrad withdrawal crystalizes what many suspected: the traditional mega-show model is broken for cycling’s current reality. It seems that the industry doesn’t need one massive, expensive, exhausting event trying to contain every conceivable stakeholder. It needs purpose-built platforms serving distinct communities—enthusiast-focused festivals, OEM sourcing summits, retail business conferences, mobility policy gatherings—each executed excellently for its specific audience.
Every industry clings too long to institutions that outlive their usefulness. Eurobike’s transformation from essential gathering to obligatory burden happened gradually, then suddenly. The ZIV and Zukunft Fahrrad didn’t kill Eurobike—they simply stopped pretending it still served them. What emerges from this transition remains uncertain, but the proliferation of successful regional shows suggests the industry’s instincts are sound. Sometimes respect for tradition means knowing when to let it rest and build what comes next.
Like this content? Sign up for the ‘Business of Cycling’ newsletter and receive updates right in your inbox.
